Want to Learn More?
Drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you!
When Passive Voice should be used by Transactional Lawyers
Forgive the clumsy title. It’s in the passive voice. The subject, transactional lawyers, is being acted upon by the verb rather than vice versa.
Those who advise transactional lawyers typically say to never use the passive voice in contracts, and most times this is sound advice. The passive voice creates undue ambiguity and risk.
But never say never. Like all parts of speech, grammatical rules, and punctuation marks, the passive voice can be useful. Today we’ll look at two passive voice cautionary tales and then explore some situations when the passive voice would be beneficial in a written agreement.
East Texas Copy Systems, Inc. v. Player
An asset purchase agreement for the sale of a small business included clauses:
– Requiring the buyer to employ the seller for a period of four years; and
– Prohibiting the seller from engaging in a competing business
The agreement also stated that the prohibition on competition would no longer be binding “if the seller’s employment with the Buyer is terminated” less than two years after the effective date of the agreement.
One day before the two-year period was going to expire, the seller quit and then sought and won a declaratory judgement from the court that the non-compete clause was no longer enforceable.
The seller hadn’t been terminated by the buyer, of course, but the passive language in the contract (“seller’s employment with the Buyer is terminated”) implied that the termination could be by either party. Using the active voice (“if the Buyer terminates the Seller’s employment” would have protected by the buyer in this circumstance.
Keltner v. Estate of Simpkins
In this case, a real estate purchase agreement ostensibly gave the buyers the option to purchase adjacent tracts of land, stating “[s]hould Buyer exercise said option to purchase, a fair and equitable price for said property will be established at a later date.”
When the buyers attempted to purchase said tracts, the trial court (and later appellate court) ruled the option unenforceable because the price term was expressed in the passive voice (“equitable price for said property will be established at a later date”) was too vague.
It didn’t make clear how the price was to be determined, and it rendered completely invalid a key term of the agreement.
The Lesson? Use the passive voice with care.
But do not think its use is always undesirable in contracts. As a general rule, contract terms should make clear the action rather than the actor, especially when the actor is irrelevant or unknowable.
In covenants, use of the passive voice is incredibly risky and should almost never be used because it does not identify which party is under obligation.
In conditional statements, such as in loan agreements, the passive voice can be useful, even critical. the conditions of a default should be described in the passive voice because a default can include things that require no action on the part of the borrower. The active voice would actually limit the scope of default to the detriment of the lender.
Or take a merger or acquisition that’s conditioned by the absence of material adverse change before closing. The condition should be described in the passive voice because the buyer wants to be able to get out of the deal regardless of who or what causes the material adverse change.
5% of Profits in September Donated to Prostate Cancer Research
In case you missed it: It’s Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, and we’re doing our part to help raise awareness and money.
One of the best weapons in the fight against prostate cancer is information. We invite you to review the risk factors associated with prostate cancer, the signs & symptoms of the disease, and to learn more about when to start screening.
The other weapon? Money, of course, and every penny counts. That’s why we’re donating 5% of profits from all new-client orders in the month of September to the PCF.
Uncover Relevant Risk Information with AADS
Knowledge is power and All American Document Services is your extra set of eyes. We make it easy to get an accurate picture of borrowers, identify any liens encumbering their assets, validate key data against public record databases, and achieve peace of mind!
Our turnaround time is 48-72 hours, but most searches are completed within 24 hours. We also fulfill priority and rush requests, and same-day document retrieval, filing and recording in some counties.
Leave a Reply
Jan 14, 2019
It’s a virtue to mean what you say, but in commercial transactions it’s even more virtuous to say what you mean — and that means ...READ MORE
Dec 30, 2018
The Patriot Act, passed in October of 2001, allows federal officials greater authority in tracking and intercepting communications, both for purposes of law enforcement and ...READ MORE
Dec 11, 2018
Do you have to run an OFAC SDN search for addresses involved in digital currency transactions? As of November 28th, yes. In a long anticipated ...READ MORE